《论语学案》与《论语后案》比较探析

刘宗周《论语学案》与黄式三《论语后案》同为浙东学派研究《论语》之经典。在注解原则上，《论语学案》志在教化，《论语后案》还原经典。在义理阐释上，《论语学案》求心之要；《论语后案》则对心颇为警惕，并将求心之要转化为寻礼之本。在解经方法上，《论语学案》直抒己见，《论语后案》重视考据。

A Comparative Study of Explaining of the Analects and Annotation After the Analects

The Explaining of the Analects by Liu Zongzhou and the Annotation after the Analects by Huang Shisan are both classics of the Eastern Zhejiang School. In terms of annotation principle, the Explaining of the Analects aims at instruction while the Annotation after the Analects aims to restore the classics. In terms of theory interpretation, the Explaining of the Analects tries to seek the heart, but the Annotation after the Analects is quite wary of the heart, and transforms the heart seeking to the etiquette seeking. In terms of the method of sutra interpreting, the Explaining of the Analects expresses its views directly. The annotation after the Analects, however, attaches great importance to textual research.