首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

中国古代的证据制度及其特点
引用本文:沈大明.中国古代的证据制度及其特点[J].社会科学,2006(7):139-145.
作者姓名:沈大明
作者单位:上海交通大学法学院
摘    要:中国古代司法的证据主要分为七种,但存在证据制度上的先天不足,表现在与西方重神判的宗教传统不同,中国审判重人判,重视口供与刑讯逼供的采用等。与西方法律相比较,中国古代的证据制度内容比较简单,加上证据采集手段的简单粗糙,官员注重自由心证,导致刑讯逼供频繁,冤假错案时有发生,证据制度应有的功能与作用发挥得并不充分。

关 键 词:古代  证据制度  特点  比较
文章编号:0257-5833(2006)07-0139-07
修稿时间:2006年4月13日

Evidence System and its Features in Ancient China
Shen Daming.Evidence System and its Features in Ancient China[J].Journal of Social Sciences,2006(7):139-145.
Authors:Shen Daming
Institution:Shen Daming
Abstract:In ancient Chinese judicatory,there were mainly seven kinds of evidence,but the system was congenitally deficient.Different from the Western religious tradition which paid more attention on divine judgment,in ancient China they emphasized on human judgment and adopted the methods of extorting a confession by torture.Compared to Western law,the evidence system in ancient China was much simpler.Moreover,because the evidence-collection procedures were very rough and the officers emphasized on free mental evidence,many unjust,false and wrong cases occurred frequently.The evidence system's function was not exerted sufficiently.
Keywords:Ancient  Evidence System  Features  Comparison  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号