首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

督促程序电子化改革的规则阐释、实践发展与完善路径
引用本文:刘超,张润.督促程序电子化改革的规则阐释、实践发展与完善路径[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2020,26(5):207-215.
作者姓名:刘超  张润
作者单位:北京师范大学 法务办公室, 北京 100875;中国人民公安大学 法学院, 北京 100038
基金项目:国家社会科学基金青年项目"辅助证据的证据规则研究"(19CFX044);中央高校基本科研基金项目"中国医疗纠纷解决机制的实效性研究"(2019JKF402);四川医事卫生法治研究中心课题(YF19-Y06)
摘    要:督促程序在我国法院实践中日渐式微,亟须对其改革。督促程序电子化改革有助于有效发挥督促程序的司法减负与案件分流功能。目前法院督促程序电子化改革实践既在《民事诉讼法》及其司法解释的框架下运作,又有一定程度的创新。它创新的关键在于实现了形式性与实质性审查的统一,这有助于督促程序高效运作,便于司法管理、审查方式、程序保障方面实现智能化。督促程序的电子化改革需要廓清其与争讼程序、简易程序、速裁程序、财产保全、先予执行的关系定位。此外,督促程序电子化改革还需要对费用分担制度、当事人诚信义务、真实完整义务,以及诉讼促进义务等问题进行配套改革和完善。

关 键 词:电子督促程序  诉讼案件  非诉化运作  形式性  实质性
修稿时间:2019/12/24 0:00:00

The interpretation, practice and improvement path of electronic reform of the supervision procedure
LIU Chao,ZHANG Run.The interpretation, practice and improvement path of electronic reform of the supervision procedure[J].Journal of Chongqing University(Social Sciences Edition),2020,26(5):207-215.
Authors:LIU Chao  ZHANG Run
Institution:Office of Legal affairs, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, P. R. China; School of Law, People''s Public Security University of China, Beijing 100038, P. R. China
Abstract:It is urgent to reform the supervision procedure, which is declining in the practice of courts in China. Electronic reform of the supervision procedure is helpful to effectively play the function of judicial burden reduction and case diversion of supervision procedure. At present, electronic reform of the supervision procedure is operating under the framework of the Civil Procedure Law and its judicial interpretation. Also, it is innovative. The key to its innovation lies in the unity of formality and materiality review, which helps to the efficient operation of the supervision procedure and facilitates the intellectualization of judicial management, review mode and procedural guarantee. It is necessary to clarify the relationship between the electronic reform of the supervision procedure and the litigation procedure, the summary procedure, the quick determination procedure, the property preservation, and the advance execution. In addition, it is necessary to reform and perfect the cost sharing system, the parties'' obligation of good faith, the true and complete obligation, and the litigation promotion obligation.
Keywords:electronic supervision procedure  court cases  operation of non-litigation  formality  materiality
点击此处可从《重庆大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《重庆大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号