| 程颢、程颐本体功夫思想之比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 屠承先.程颢、程颐本体功夫思想之比较[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2000,30(5):59-64. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 屠承先 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 浙江大学人文学院!浙江杭州310028 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 虽然程颢和程颐只是有着不同的宇宙本体论倾向，却导致了他们两者具有很大不同的人学本体论、功夫论和本体功夫思想。为此，比较一下这两者的不同及其原由，对于进一步理解宇宙本体论在哲学中的主导地位和深入探究本体功夫思想都是十分有益的。
|
| 关 键 词： | 程颢 程颐 本体功夫思想 比较 |
| 修稿时间： | ] |
A Comparative Study on Cheng Yi's and Cheng Hao's Benti-gongfu Thought |
| |
| TU Cheng,xian.A Comparative Study on Cheng Yi''''s and Cheng Hao''''s Benti-gongfu Thought[J].Journal of Zhejiang University(Humanities and Social Sciences),2000,30(5):59-64. |
| |
| Authors: | TU Cheng xian |
| |
| Abstract: | The difference in Cheng Yi
and Cheng Hao's inclination to cosmic ontology leads to their radically different
anthropological ontology, Gongfu theories and Benti-gongfu thoughts. It is of great
benefit to make a comparative study of the differences between these two and the causes
that led to them. And such work will promote our understanding of the dominant status of
cosmic ontology in philo sophy and the study of Benti-gongfu thought as well. |
| |
| Keywords: | Cheng Yi Cheng Hao Benti gongfu thonght comparative |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文 |
