中国学术期刊的综合影响力分析——以40种权威社科期刊为例

文章以2014年《中国人文社会科学期刊评价报告》公布的40种权威期刊为研究对象,结合一手调查数据和部分公开数据,通过建立学术期刊综合影响力的评价指标体系,对权威学术期刊的综合影响力进行分析和评价.研究发现,基金论文比、网上下载率、海外论文比、复合总被引、三大文摘转载率、人大复印资料转载率指标与权威期刊的复合影响因子正相关;本单位论文比、2013年复合统计源引用指标对权威期刊复合影响因子的影响不明显;期刊的数字化程度越高,其复合影响因子越高,不过权威期刊建有微博和微信平台的比例相对较低,只有少数期刊使用优先出版;权威期刊他引总引比很高;权威期刊复合影响因子的高低与期刊自身的影响力、期刊所在学科的热门程度、期刊的栏目设置和文章质量密切相关;不同学科权威期刊影响因子间的差异一直会存在,并且有稳定延续的趋势.最后,根据结论提出了学术期刊提高综合影响力的相关政策建议.

Analysis of the core influence of Chinese academic journals: Example of 40 authoritative social science journals

In this paper, the 40 kinds of social science journals, which are included in "Chinese Journal of Humanities and Social Science Evaluation Report 2014", are studied. Combined with one hand survey data and some public data, this paper establishes the evaluation index system of the comprehensive influence of academic journals to analyze and evaluate the comprehensive influence of the authority academic journals. The research finds that the ratio of funded papers, online download rates, overseas papers, the composite total citation, the reprint rate of the three main abstracts, and the rate of reprint and copy of information center for social sciences of Renmin University of China, have a positive correlation with the composite impact factor of the authoritative journals. The higher the digital level of journals, the higher the composite impact factor, but authority journals have a relatively low proportion of micro blog and micro channel platforms, and only a few of them are published in priority. Authoritative journals are mostly cited by other publications. The composite impact factor of authoritative journals are closely related to the influence of journals, the popular degree of the subject, the setting of columns and the quality of the articles. There are always differences of impact factor between the different disciplines journals. Finally, according to the conclusion, the relevant policy suggestions are put forward to improve the comprehensive influence of academic journals.