Multiple Comparison Procedures: The Practical Solution |
| |
Authors: | D. J. Saville |
| |
Affiliation: | Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries , P.O. Box 24, Lincoln, Canterbury , New Zealand |
| |
Abstract: | A practicing statistician looks at the multiple comparison controversy and related issues through the eyes of the users. The concept of consistency is introduced and discussed in relation to five of the more common multiple comparison procedures. All of the procedures are found to be inconsistent except the simplest procedure, the unrestricted least significant difference (LSD) procedure (or multiple t test). For this and other reasons the unrestricted LSD procedure is recommended for general use, with the proviso that it should be viewed as a hypothesis generator rather than as a method for simultaneous hypothesis generation and testing. The implications for Scheffé's test for general contrasts are also discussed, and a new recommendation is made. |
| |
Keywords: | Comparisonwise error rate Duncan's multiple range test Experimentwise error rate Power Teaching of statistics Tukey's honest significant difference procedure Waller—Duncan k-ratio test |
|
|