首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

非法吸收公众存款罪中借贷合同的效力探究
引用本文:龚振军,方红丽. 非法吸收公众存款罪中借贷合同的效力探究[J]. 浙江师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2014, 0(3): 25-29
作者姓名:龚振军  方红丽
作者单位:浙江师范大学法政学院,浙江金华321004
基金项目:教育部项目“刑法解释限度理论的反思性解读与限度认定模式探究”(12YJC820029);教育厅项目“刑法解释限度疑难问题研究”(Y201122074)
摘    要:
关于非法吸收公众存款罪中借贷合同的效力问题,理论界和实务界争议颇多,主要有以下三种代表性的观点:一是无效说,二是有效说,三是区别对待说。这三种观点从不同角度对非法吸收公众存款罪中借贷合同的效力问题进行了论述,虽有一定的合理之处,但都存在着不同程度的缺陷及不足。文章指出,准确认定借贷合同的效力应根据行为人的借款目的区别对待:以正常生产经营为目的的涉案借贷合同应有效;以放贷为目的的涉案借贷合同应无效。

关 键 词:借贷合同  效力  借款目的  放贷

A Study of the Validity of Loan Contracts Related to the Crime of Illegal Pooling of Public Deposits
GONG Zhen-jun,FANG Hong-li. A Study of the Validity of Loan Contracts Related to the Crime of Illegal Pooling of Public Deposits[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Normal University:Social Sciences, 2014, 0(3): 25-29
Authors:GONG Zhen-jun  FANG Hong-li
Affiliation:(College of Law and Political Science, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, China)
Abstract:
There are still many controversies on the validity of loan contracts related to the crime of illegal pooling of public deposits in theory and practice .Now there exist the following representative points of view:the first considers the contracts invalid , the second claims the contracts should be effective , and the third states the contracts should be treated differently .The opinions mentioned above have discussed the question from different angles and have some reasonable parts , but there are also various degrees of flaws in each opinion.To determine the validity of loan contracts accurately , we should treat the contracts differently according to the doer ’ s purpose of borrowing .The contracts should be effective if the doer ’ s purpose is for regular production and management .And the contracts , intended to lend , are supposed to be invalid .
Keywords:loan contracts  validity  purpose of borrowing  lend
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号