| 证明责任判决的裁判方法论意义——兼评传统证明责任观之谬误 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 肖建华,王德新.证明责任判决的裁判方法论意义——兼评传统证明责任观之谬误[J].北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2005,21(2):44-51. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 肖建华 王德新 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 中国政法大学,北京,100088
2. 山东师范大学,政法学院,济南,250014 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 我国主流的证明责任理念认为,当事人对自己的事实主张应当提供证据,不提提供证据予以证明时应当承担败诉后果,这一观点是值得反思的.证明责任理论是法律适用的例外,即当当事人的的事实主张被证明为真实或虚假时,法官只需适用或不适用相应的法律规范即可作出判决,但当事实真伪不明时,逻辑上法官处于法律适用的两难境地.为了帮助法官完成判决义务,才产生了证明责任理论.所以,时下过分夸大证明责任对于裁判的意义,是不恰当的.
|
| 关 键 词： | 证明责任 判决 法律适用 方法论 |
The Methodological of Meaning of Burden of Proof Judgement in Civil Law System: A Concurrent Analysis of Its Misuse by Chinese Scholars |
| |
| XIAO Jian-hua,WANG De-xin.The Methodological of Meaning of Burden of Proof Judgement in Civil Law System: A Concurrent Analysis of Its Misuse by Chinese Scholars[J].Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing(Social Sciences Edition),2005,21(2):44-51. |
| |
| Authors: | XIAO Jian-hua WANG De-xin |
| |
| Abstract: | The main stream of the burden of proof theory holds that the party will lose the case if he/she fails to present enough evidence; this should be altered. This theroy of burden of proof arises to help the judges finish their judging duty,therefore, it is improper to over-exagerate the meanings of burden of proof to passing judgements. |
| |
| Keywords: | burden of proof judgment law application methodology |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
