金岳霖的知识概念及相关比较

金岳霖没有直接回答何谓知识，但揭示了知识事实是关系事实，知识等同于真命题。他立足于常识，肯定知识之有，回答了知识的可能问题和知识的限制问题，但又明确指出他的知识论不涉及这两个问题。当代知识论学家在普遍接受柏拉图知识概念的同时，通过回应盖蒂尔挑战来完善传统的知识概念。为此，他们提出了无假信念条件、挫败条件、可靠性理论、结论性理由以及因果理论等方案。但是，这些方案无法弥补传统知识概念的不足和缺陷。金岳霖的知识概念与当代知识论中的知识概念有许多相同之处，但也存在明显区别。后者主要表现为金岳霖和当代知识论学家对知识有无明确的定义、知识的构成要素、怀疑论的挑战、知识概念的分析方法等方面持有不同观点。

On Jin Yuelin's Concept of Knowledge and Relevant Comparison

Jin Yuelin does not directly answer whatknowledge is.However,he reveals that the fact of knowledge is the fact of relationship,and knowledge is equivalent to true proposition.On the basis of common sense,Jin Yuelin affirms there is knowledge.He simply illustrates the probability and restriction of knowledge,but he clearly points out that his theory of knowledge has nothing to do with the probability and restriction of knowledge.Contemporary epistemologists accept the concept of Plato’s knowledge and put forward theories in order to respond Gettier’s challenge,such as,no false belief condition,defeasibility,reliability,conclusive reasons and the causal theory.However,these theories could not remedy the traditional concept of knowledge.Two kinds of the concept of knowledge have a lot of same content and many differences that there are diverse viewpoints on whether to have definition of knowledge,constituent elements of knowledge,skepticism challenge and method of analysis of the concept of knowledge between Jin Yuelin and contemporary epistemologists.