| 还是多读一点书的好——略评《学术考辨与文史涵养不可或缺》一文 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王辉斌.还是多读一点书的好——略评《学术考辨与文史涵养不可或缺》一文[J].学术界,2012(5):106-114,286. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王辉斌 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 湖北文理学院文学院,湖北 襄阳,441053 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 《学术界》2012年2期发表的谭庄《学术考辨与文史涵养不可或缺——兼与王辉斌先生商榷》一文,不仅"商榷"的方法与结论全为错误,而且也是作者文献学功底严重欠缺,写作心态浮躁与草率,不谙史实、不谙称谓、不谙校雔、不谙典制、不谙物侯、不谙文体、不谙格律、不谙词义、不谙地理、不谙历算的具体反映。现将其以"条辨"的形式逐一揭示,并略作评析,以供参考。
|
| 关 键 词： | 文献学功底欠缺 心态浮躁 信口开河 自说自话 |
Better to Read More——Comment on “Both Academic Research and Cultural Reservation are Indispensable” |
| |
| Wang Huibin.Better to Read More——Comment on “Both Academic Research and Cultural Reservation are Indispensable”[J].Academics in China,2012(5):106-114,286. |
| |
| Authors: | Wang Huibin |
| |
| Institution: | Wang Huibin College of Liberal Arts,Hubei University of Arts and Science |
| |
| Abstract: | It is a wonderful performance of the author’s innocence and shallow literature knowledge in"Both Academic Research and Cultural Reservation are Indispensable"— to Discuss with Pro. Wang Huibin ( Academics,2,2012) . Both the way to "discuss"and the conclusion drawn are wrong. It shows that the author has terribly shallow literature knowledge and an impatient and thoughtless attitude towards academics,knowing nothing about history,appellation,collation,phenology,court system,literary styles,metrics,semantics,and geography. This paper aims at demonstrating all of these mistakes one item by item,and making comments,for reference. |
| |
| Keywords: | shallow knowledge about literature impatient and thoughtless attitude opionated |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
