胡风研究:历史的还原与问题的凸显——对商金林、吴永平、解志熙诸先生胡风研究的考量

在新世纪,商金林、吴永平、解志熙等人在胡风研究方面做出了很大的成绩,得到了学界的关注.商金林对胡风1927年到1928年胡风编辑《武汉评论》和《策进》史料进行了详细论证,为学界贡献了新的材料,但其认为现代作家日记、书信中的胡风的负面形象更真实,这个观点似有商榷之处；吴永平在《隔膜与猜忌——胡风与姚雪垠的世纪纷争》中挖掘了大量史料,但其关于胡风文艺思想是“党的文学”的观点并不全然合理,且论述过程也有诸多不尽人意之处；解志熙认为胡风主张启蒙优先甚至启蒙优胜论的观点也与事实有一定的出入.总之,上述诸人在为胡风研究做出重要贡献的同时,也存在着诸般可供商榷的地方.

Research on Hu Feng:History Restored and Problems Highlighted——Discussing Shang Jinlin,Wu Yongping and Xie Zhixi’s Research on Hu Feng

In the new century,some scholars including Shang Jinlin,Wu Yongping and Xie Zhixi made great achievements on Hu Feng study.They aroused close attention from academic circles.Shang did detailed textual researches on history materials of Wu Han Comments and Ce Jin which were edited from 1927 to 1928.In my opinion,It needs to discuss that Hu Feng’s negative images in modern writers’ diaries and letters were true.Although he made new discoveries,Wu Yongping also provided many materials in "The Diaphragm and Suspicion — Hu Feng and Yao Xueyin’s Century Disputations",but the idea which Hu Feng’s thought on literature and art is "The CCP’s literature" seems unreasonable,and his discussion has shortcomings too.In Xie Zhixi’s opinion,Hu Feng’s advocating enlightenment must be placed for the first place or enlightenment leads to Victory.I think it is not suitable to the facts.In short,all of their studies contributed to Hu Feng study,and there are questions still worth discussing.