民事发回重审之功能论

民事诉讼中发回重审在司法实践中确保初审程序的正当化,明确了上下级法院职能分工,保障诉讼当事人两审终审之利益。发回重审以其独有的功能而区别于其它二审裁决方式。但实务操作中因法律笼统规定等相关因素和制度本身种种弊端使得发回重审滥用现象严重,这也与民事诉讼追求的效率与公正价值取向背道而驰。虽然我国在2012年8月新修的《民事诉讼法》中完善了发回重审制度,但对于发回重审的具体事由以及相关处理程序仍有待规范。因此,适当限制发回重审是由,严格把控重审程序,给予当事人一定的程序选择权,对消解发回重审的滥用和当事人诉讼利益的保护,彰显法治权威和统一有着不可小觑的作用。

Function of Civil Remand for Retrial

The retrial in civil litigation could help the normal first trial procedure and clarify the respective duties in different courts to ensure the interests of the parties in the trial. It has its unique function which is different from the second ruling way. In the practice,there is serious abuse of the retrial because of the general rules in the law and flaws in the rules themselves which goes against the efficiency and justice in civil cases. Although in August,2012 ciail rerand for retrial was developed in new Civil Proledure haw,its conerete causesand its procedure showld be reqiclaxed. As a consequence,appropriate control of the retrial and strict control of retrial procedure should be needed with certain procedure option for the parties to clear np the douse of nemand for netrial and guarantee the panty＇s rights and to manifest the authority of the rule of law and unity.