首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论法官为刑法解释的应然主体
引用本文:刘守芬,房树新.论法官为刑法解释的应然主体[J].河南大学学报(社会科学版),2005,45(3):36-41.
作者姓名:刘守芬  房树新
作者单位:北京大学,法学院,北京,100871
摘    要:刑法适用的生命在于解释。我国现阶段正处于社会转型时期,客观上对刑法解释的需求更为紧迫。基于世界各国通行的观点及我国的实际情况,将视点主要放在审判领域内的刑法解释,提出刑法解释的应然主体是法官,并分别从我国的政治体制、刑法思想的客观说,以及社会发展变化和成文法相对稳定之间的矛盾等方面加以探讨,进而完善我国刑法解释,对促进我国的刑法建设具有重大价值和意义。

关 键 词:刑法解释  应然主体  法官解释
文章编号:1000-5242(2005)03-0036-06
修稿时间:2005年3月8日

On Judge as the Natural Subject of Explication in Criminal Cases
LIU Shou-fen,FANG Shu-xin.On Judge as the Natural Subject of Explication in Criminal Cases[J].Journal of Henan University(Social Science),2005,45(3):36-41.
Authors:LIU Shou-fen  FANG Shu-xin
Abstract:The life of criminal law lies in its being explicated. Our country is now in a period of social transformation, the requirement for explication of criminal law is therefore more urgent. In accordance with common practice in the world and the practical situation in our country, the judge should be the natural subject of criminal explication. This view is based on a careful analysis of our political system, idea of criminal law, and social development in our country, and is of significance for the construction of our criminal law.
Keywords:explication of criminal law  natural subject  judge's explication
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号