On a problem of counting by weighing

Suppose it is desired to obtain a large number N_s of items for which individual counting is impractical, but one can demand a batch to weigh at least w units so that the number of items N in the batch may be close to the desired number N_s. If the items have mean weight ωTH, it is reasonable to have w equal to ωTHN_s when ωTH is known. When ωTH is unknown, one can take a sample of size n, not bigger than N_s, estimate ωTH by a good estimator ω_n, and set w equal to ω_nN_s. Let R_n = Kp²N²_s/n + K_sn be a measure of loss, where K_e and K_s are the coefficients representing the cost of the error in estimation and the cost of the sampling respectively, and p is the coefficient of variation for the weight of the items. If one determines the sample size to be the integer closest to pCN_s when p is known, where C is (K_e/K_s)^1/2, then R_n will be minimized. If p is unknown, a simple sequential procedure is proposed for which the average sample number is shown to be asymptotically equal to the optimal fixed sample size. When the weights are assumed to have a gamma distribution given ω and ω has a prior inverted gamma distribution, the optimal sample size can be found to be the nonnegative integer closest to pCN_s + p²A(pC – 1), where A is a known constant given in the prior distribution.