首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

民事行政案件检察监督之我见
引用本文:李红新,林山泉.民事行政案件检察监督之我见[J].江南大学学报(人文社会科学版),2002,1(4):19-22.
作者姓名:李红新  林山泉
作者单位:无锡市,中级人民法院,江苏,无锡,214002
摘    要:由于传统司法观念在民事行政检察监督权性质认识上混淆了刑事抗诉和民事抗诉的概念 ,在司法实践中不能有效把握既判力原则与有错必纠原则 ,审判独立与检察监督的辩证统一 ,使得现行的民事行政案件检察监督机制打破了民行案件诉讼两造间平等格局 ,不能适应法治社会的发展。为了使民事行政案件检察监督实现良性的发展 ,就应设计一种互动的抗诉机制 ,促使检法两家形成互相独立、互相制约、互相促进的局面。

关 键 词:民事行政检察权  抗诉  既判力  有错必纠  良性互动
文章编号:1671-6973(2002)04-0019-04
修稿时间:2002年4月11日

On Monitoring Civil Administration Cases
LI Hong xin, LIN Shan quan.On Monitoring Civil Administration Cases[J].Journal of Southern Yangtze University:Humanities & Social Sciences Edition,2002,1(4):19-22.
Authors:LI Hong xin  LIN Shan quan
Abstract:While recognizing the characters of the rights of procuratorial work and supervision in civil administer the traditional law concept confuses the definition of criminal counter appeals and civil ones. Thus, practically people can grasp effectively the principles of complete court decision and principles of correcting mistakes, and the dialectical unity between independent trails and procuratorial work and supervision. This makes the current procuratorial work and supervision system for civil administration case break the balance between the civil lawsuits and criminal ones and can not suit the development of a legal society. This paper intends to design a kind of mutual counter litigation system and situation for mutual independence, mutual restriction and mutual promotion between procuratorial work and law. This system and situation will achieve a better development of procuratorial work and supervision in civil administration case.
Keywords:procuratorial work rights for civil administrations  counter appeals  complete court decision  correcting mistakes  fine interaction
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号