首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

双重维度看陷阱抗辩之证明责任
引用本文:刘如浩.双重维度看陷阱抗辩之证明责任[J].河南工业大学学报(社会科学版),2010,6(2):69-72.
作者姓名:刘如浩
作者单位:苏州大学,法学院,江苏,苏州,215006
摘    要:刑事诉讼中被告人以陷阱侦查作为其出罪的抗辩理由之一,此抗辩即为陷阱抗辩。出于对控辩双方证明能力和证明手段对比之考量,陷阱抗辩的证明责任分为客观合法性证明和主观倾向性证明两个层面,分别由控辩双方承担。这种独特的证明责任构成是诱惑侦查案件中重要的分配正义的方式之一。

关 键 词:陷阱抗辩  客观合法性  主观倾向性

ON THE TESTIFYING RESPONSIBILITY OF TRAP DEFENSING FROM DUAL DIMENSION
LIU Ru-hao.ON THE TESTIFYING RESPONSIBILITY OF TRAP DEFENSING FROM DUAL DIMENSION[J].Journal of Henan University of Technology:Social Science Edition,2010,6(2):69-72.
Authors:LIU Ru-hao
Institution:LIU Ru-hao (School of Law,Suzhou University,Suzhou 215006,China)
Abstract:The accused in criminal proceedings will use trap detecting as a defense of the crime and this defense is known as trap defense.Out of the unbalanced comparison of proven ability and proven methods between the prosecution and the accused,the burden of proof in trap defense should be divided into two levels: objective legitimacy and subjective bias.The above two levels should be undertaken by the prosecution and the accused respectively.This unique constitution of burden of proof is one of the important ways of distributing justice in enticement investigating cases.
Keywords:trap defense  objective legitimacy  subjective bias
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号