| "全人生指导"和"全人教育"思想比较研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 冯秋香."全人生指导"和"全人教育"思想比较研究[J].河南社会科学,2003,11(3):177-179. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 冯秋香 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 浙江大学,教育学院,浙江,杭州,310028 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 杨贤江的“全人生指导”和日本小原国芳的“全人教育论”均产生于20世纪20年代,两种教育思想有相通之处;以人为本,主张学生和谐全面发展,批判教育弊端。但两种教育思想的核心和主旨存在根本差异:小原国芳以宗教为最高价值,调和教育和工业化发展的矛盾,以其理论为指导付诸办学实践;杨贤江以马克思主义教育理论为武器,指导青年学生的革命运动。
|
| 关 键 词： | “全人生指导” “全人教育” 素质教育 |
| 文章编号： | 1007-905X(2003)03-0177-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003年3月25日 |
The comparison study on the view of "Guide to all life" and "Education of whole man" |
| |
| FENG Qiu-xiang.The comparison study on the view of "Guide to all life" and "Education of whole man"[J].Henan Social Sciences,2003,11(3):177-179. |
| |
| Authors: | FENG Qiu-xiang |
| |
| Abstract: | In 1920' s Yang Xian-Jiang' s "Guide to all life" and Xiao yuan guo fang' s "Education of whole man" were being in different country,one in China,the other in Japan.During the world educational reform wind,their resemblences were clear: starting point from student,round development,and reformation on educational defects.Their differences were obvious in the opinion of the cental view and the aim. |
| |
| Keywords: | Guide to all life Education of whole man quality-education |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
