公诉制度的利益衡平论

在现代刑事诉讼追求惩罚犯罪和保护人权的双重目的支配下 ,国家利益、被害人利益、被告人利益构成了公诉制度中三种基本利益 ,对任何一种利益的保护过分上扬或萎缩都有可能导致诉讼客观、公正、民主的离去。因此 ,一方面确保刑事诉讼目的的实现是公诉制度追求利益衡平的理论依据 ;另一方面 ,代表国家利益的公诉权需要制约是公诉制度利益衡平的现实需要。我国现行公诉制度利益衡平实现机制同我国刑事诉讼的双重目的基本上是适应的 ,但是 ,在强化对辩护方利益的保护等方面仍有待进一步完善

Discussing Benefits Balance in the Public Prosecution System

Under these circumstances that the double purposes of punishing the offense and protecting human rights dominate modern criminal procedure, state's benefit and victim's benefit and defendant's benefit constitute three basic kinds of benefit in the public prosecution system. That protection of any one of them goes up or falls off must lead to losing objectivity and justice and democracy of lawsuit. Therefore, one side, purposes of criminal procedure offer the theoretical basis of benefits balance in the public prosecution system; the other side, that the power of public prosecution needs to be limited is a actual needs of benefits balance in the system. Our present mechanism agrees with mainly purposes of criminal procedure, but some aspects want to be improved.