首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Group Benefit and Protection of Pediatric Research Subjects: Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger and the Lead Abatement Study
Authors:Loretta M. Kopelman
Affiliation:Professor and Chair, Department of Medical Humanities , Brody School of Medicine , Greenville, North Carolina, USA
Abstract:

The Maryland Court of Appeals in Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger Institute was sharply critical of the lead abatement study conducted by this Institute, an affiliate of Johns Hopkins University. Grimes ruled that investigators might, given the facts of the case, have a special relationship with subjects, thereby creating a duty of care that could, if breached, give rise to an action in negligence. This ruling has implications for pediatric research practices and long-standing disputes among informed people of good will about what pediatric studies should be permitted.
Keywords:Children  Research  Ethics  Federal Regulations  Law  Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger Institute  Consent
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号