首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


EPA's 2006 Human-Subjects Rule for Pesticide Experiments
Authors:Kristin Shrader-Frechette
Affiliation:1. Department of Biological Sciences and Department of Philosophy , University of Notre Dame , Notre Dame, IN, USA kshrader@nd.edu
Abstract:
Arguing that the 2006 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) human-subjects rule allows use of unethical third-party research (on pregnant women and children) in setting pesticide regulations, this article first (a) provides a brief history of U.S. pesticide regulation, particularly regarding childhood safety. Next it (b) outlines ethical and scientific loopholes in the 2006 EPA rule; (c) shows how the Human Subjects Review Board, mandated by the 2006 rule, has been implemented in flawed ways; and (d) illustrates that one source of problems with the rule may be influence by those with conflicts of interest.
Keywords:advisory board  children  consent  developmental effects  Environmental Protection Agency  dosing studies  Human Subjects Review Board  insecticide  institutional review board  Nazi  neurological effects  Nuremberg  organophosphate  pesticide  regulations  re-registration  sample size
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号