Deux définitions de la collégialité et leur articulation: le cas d’un diocèse catholique |
| |
Authors: | Emmanuel Lazega Olivier Wattebled |
| |
Affiliation: | a ORIO/IRISSO-CNRS, université Paris-Dauphine et CMH, ENS Jourdan, place du Maréchal-de-Lattre-de-Tassigny, 75775 Paris cedex 16, France;b CLERSE, faculté des sciences économiques et sociales, université des sciences et technologies de Lille 1, bâtiment sh2, 59655 Villeneuve d’Ascq cedex, France |
| |
Abstract: | Against the background of the conflict observed between managers and professionals, two definitions of collegiality are identified: on the one hand, as a specific organizational form (bottom up) and, on the other, as a procedure of bureaucratic management (top down). A study of networks of priests in a catholic diocese in France is used to explore how these two definitions are related. Questions are raised about the effects of a too narrow organizational rationalization that uses collegiality only as a top down, bureaucratic managerial procedure. This always entails the risk of making the work done by experts sterile because it overlooks the first type of collegiality, which is based on the nature of the nonroutine tasks that members perform jointly thanks to an endogenous organizational structure of a bottom up type. |
| |
Keywords: | Mots clé s: Bureaucratie Collé gialité bottom up Collé gialité top down É glise Ré seaux de prê tres Expertise ProfessionalsBureaucracy Bottom up collegiality Top down collegiality Catholic Church Networks Priests Experts Professionals France |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|