首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

莫言、诺奖、批评及批评的批评——对话《对话〈直议莫言与诺奖〉》
引用本文:王金胜.莫言、诺奖、批评及批评的批评——对话《对话〈直议莫言与诺奖〉》[J].东方论坛,2014(5):98-105.
作者姓名:王金胜
作者单位:青岛大学 文学院,山东 青岛,266071
摘    要:在众多批评莫言小说的评论家中,李建军是一位有着鲜明个性的否定性批评的代表之一,其《直议莫言与诺奖》可谓全面评析莫言创作的论文。针对此文,孟祥中的《对话〈直议莫言与诺奖〉》从各方面提出了商榷意见。鉴于孟文对一些事实的轻忽,在论辩过程中也存在割裂李文论述的连续性、抽离具体语境和跨论域批评等问题,未顾及"全篇""全人",而未能切实而有效地达到对话和商榷的目的。

关 键 词:《对话〈直议莫言与诺奖〉》  《直议莫言与诺奖》  莫言  文学批评

Mo Yan,Nobel Prize,Criticism and Criticism of Such Criticism:A Dialogue with "Dialogue with 'Straight Comments on Mo Yan and His Nobel Prize'"
WANG Jin-sheng.Mo Yan,Nobel Prize,Criticism and Criticism of Such Criticism:A Dialogue with "Dialogue with 'Straight Comments on Mo Yan and His Nobel Prize'"[J].Orient Forum,2014(5):98-105.
Authors:WANG Jin-sheng
Institution:WANG Jin-sheng ( School of Liberal Arts, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China )
Abstract:Among the many critics of novels by Mo Yan, Li Jianjun is one of the distinctive representatives making negative criticism. His paper "Straight Comments on Mo Yan and His Nobel Prize" analyses his works comprehensively. In regard to his comments, Meng Xiangzhong presents his own opinions in his own paper. However, Meng's paper has ignored some facts, broken the continuity of Li's argument, diverted from concrete contexts, and criticized by going beyond domains, thus neglecting the"whole text" and "whole person" and failing to achieve the purpose of efifcient dialogue and discussion.
Keywords:Dialogue with ‘Straight Comments on Moyan and His Nobel prize  Straight Comments on Moyan and His Nobel Prize  Mo Yan  Li Jianjun  literary criticism
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号