语言流中的文学语言

文学的科学化诉求引发了划分文学语言与非文学语言的冲动。在文论史上，理论家们曾尝试区分日常语言与文学语言、标准语与诗语言及科学语言与诗语言的差异。这些区分一般倾向于在静态框架之内展开。从动态观点来看，日常语言与文学语言之间存在着相互转化；标准语和诗语言之间呈现为相互支撑；科学语言与诗语言之间体现为逻各斯与神话的对立互补。从发生学角度看，语言就是那种在持续流动中减损消逝并增补更新着的事物。语言的内在流变性证明，任何关于文学语言本质的抽象和规定都是不可能的。

Literary Language in the Language Flow

Scientific literature appeals caused a division of the impulse of the literary language and literary language. In the history of literary theory, theorists have tried to distinguish between everyday language, standard language and literature and poetry language and scientific language and language differences. These distinctions generally tend to be in a static framework. From the dynamic point of view, there is reciprocal transformation between everyday language and literary language. Between the standard language and poetry is to support each other;Scientific language and poetry embodied in the logos and myth between complementary opposites. From genealogical perspective, language is the loss in the continuous flow away and supplement to update the things. Language internal rheological property certificate, any abstract and rules about the nature of the literary language is impossible.