考据中的"误区"与"误区"中的考据--李白"两入长安"问题争论之反思

"两入长安"之说虽已基本确立,但仍然争论未休.造成这种局面,除了史料欠缺这一主因外,与考据中陷入多重"误区"也有很大的关系.这表现在或随意理解史料,以主观臆断代替客观分析;或孤立地看待材料,以偏概全,一叶障目,不及其余;还有的不守考据之规则,随意使用未经证实的材料.这是李白研究界存在的学风问题的反映.因此应该建立学术规范,以确保在"对话"的环境中推进李白研究的深入.

Reflections on the Arguments Concerning Li Bai's Twice Going into Chang'an

Remarks concerning Twice Going into Chang'an have been established,however,there still exist arguments.Besides the lack of historical evidence as the main reason,this can also be accounted for by multi fold mistakes in the studies.They include understanding historical evidence willfully,using subjective supposition instead of objective analysis,or emphasizing partial points while ignoring the whole,in addition to violating rules in studies and using unproved materials,etc.This is the reflection of the style of study in the circles of Li Bai studies.So,it is necessary to establish academic norms to ensure the deepening of Li Bai studies.