| 证伪主义传统与现代金融学方法论的进化 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 孟科学.证伪主义传统与现代金融学方法论的进化[J].山东科技大学学报(社会科学版),2014(3):51-57. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 孟科学 |
| |
| 作者单位： | [1]山东科技大学经济管理学院,山东青岛266590; [2]中南财经政法大学经济学院,湖北武汉430073 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 中同博士后科研基金项目“基于秩序理论的证券交易跨市场监管理论研究”（2012M521510） |
| |
| 摘 要： | 科学发展的模式就是陷入危机的旧范式终为新范式所取代的过程，对金融理论预测证伪性研究的努力导致了金融学理论应用技术和研究范式的不断革新。现代金融理论创新、研究范式变革都要求我们抛弃具有短期功利主义的证实，广泛吸收自然科学的最新成果来证伪和发展现有的框架体系，推动金融理论方法变革和研究范式转换，不断提高理论对现实的前瞻性。
|
| 关 键 词： | 证伪主义 研究范式 金融学方法论 |
Falsification and the Evolution of Modern Finance Methodology |
| |
| MENG Kexue.Falsification and the Evolution of Modern Finance Methodology[J].Journal of Shandong University of Sciences & Technology(Social Science),2014(3):51-57. |
| |
| Authors: | MENG Kexue |
| |
| Institution: | MENG Kexue( 1. College of Economics and Management, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao , Shandong 266590, China; 2. Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430074, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The pattern of scientific progress is the process in which the old paradigm in crisis is eventually replaced by the new. And studies on the falsification of financial theory lead to the continuous innovation of application technology and research paradigm in financial theory. Research paradigm reform and modern finance innovation require us to constantly get over historical limitations for falsification and developing existing frameworks, abandoning short-term utilitarian verification, and absorbing all latest achievements of natural sciences to promote financial theory innovation and research paradigm shift and to enhance theoretical foresight. |
| |
| Keywords: | falsification research paradigm finance methodology |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
