论正当防卫评价的相对性

我国正当防卫的规定具有不同于其他国家的特点，关于正当防卫的正当化根据应解读为自我保全、优越利益以及法确证原理。否定防卫挑拨成立正当防卫应从挑拨者基准说、被侵害者基准说和防卫者基准说三方面进行把握。第三人为保护挑拨人利益实施防卫的，成立假想防卫；被挑拨者对第三人实施攻击，第三人自己以及挑拨者为保护第三人的利益实施防卫行为，成立正当防卫。唆使、帮助正当防卫行为的，不应评价为共犯予以处罚；利用他人正当防卫杀人，不成立杀人罪的间接正犯，而是成立杀人罪的教唆犯。数人共同实施防卫行为的，是否防卫过当，应进行相对性、个别判断。

The Research of The Relativity of Self-defense

The regulation about self - defense in Chinese criminal law is diferent from other country. Justified self - defense should be interpreted as the principle self - preservation, superior interest and confirmed by law. At the light of the stander of provoking person, victims and defenders： the third person who protects the provoking person＇s interest would compos imaginary defense; the conducts of the third person and the provoking person could be hold as self - defense for protecting the third person, when attacker attack the third person ; instigator and assistance of self - defense should not be hold as accomplice; ifself- defense if implemenited by several persons, we should distinguish itindividually.