知识产权刑民交叉案件解决之“先民后刑”思路:选择理由与实施机制

先刑后民一直是我国处理刑民交叉案件所遵循的主导性原则,该原则的适用在理论和实践上面临一些困境。在知识产权民刑交叉案件的处理上,我们需要重新认识民事程序的价值意义和功能意义,在此基础上对刑民两种司法程序进行合理衔接与协调,建立民、刑分庭审理意义上的先民后刑以及民、刑合庭审理意义上的先民后刑审理机制。

The Thinking of the Solution of Civil Action's prior to Criminal Action in the Interlocked Penal and Civil Cases of Intellectual Property:the Reason for the Chosen and the mechanism of the Implementation

The principle of Criminal Action's Prior to Civil Action has been controlling the resolving process of interlocked penal and civil cases for a long time,which was put into some trouble when applied in both theory and practice.So we need to find a new value and function indicating civil procedure,based on which we can found the trial mechanism of Civil Action's Priority over Criminal Action by both dividing and combining civil trial and criminal trial,and assorted with the two procedure reasonably.