曹操入葬事迹杂考

河南安阳曹魏高陵的发现震动学术界。其墓主是否为曹操,引起了广泛的争论。该文依据相关文献材料,认为其墓主为曹操,并对否认墓主人为曹操的几个主要论点分别加以反驳,得出以下看法:"魏武王"石牌、石枕绝非伪造,确为证明墓主身份之铁证;哀策、王印不在墓中有其特殊原因,不能据此质疑考古结论;曹操入葬时未曾建造疑冢,故不应将此墓视作疑冢;曹操墓不可能位于安徽亳州曹氏宗族墓葬群。

An Examination of Cao Cao's Burial

The discoverry of the Wei mausoleum in Anyang, Henan has rocked the academic field. A uni- versal discussion has been gone on about whether the buried one is Cao Cao. The author, with relevant literature as his basis, holds that the buried one is Cao Cao, and tries to refute the arguments against the buried one being him, reaching the following conclusions： the stele of ＂King Wu of Wei＂ and the stone pillow are not fake and are the proof of the tomb being that of Cao Cao; the mourning slip and the royal seal are not in the tomb for special reasons and should not be the arguments against the archealogical conclusion; when Cao Cao was intered, a nominal tomb was not built, so this tomb should not be regarded as such a tomb; Cao Cao＇s tomb can not be in the tomb group of the Cao clan.