| 柏拉图的"神" |
| |
| 引用本文： | 石永泽.柏拉图的"神"[J].北方论丛,2005(3):119-124. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 石永泽 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 上海社会科学院,哲学所,上海,200020 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 柏拉图"神"的范畴演变说明他并未因采用"通种论"而放弃"目的论",而是对"相"的目的论进行改造,并隐约指涉了以"相"和"奴斯"(理性)合一为特征的"神"的目的论.决不可把柏拉图的"神"与犹太-基督教的"神"(上帝)相等同,但柏拉图<蒂迈欧篇>中对"神"因此的描述几近犹太-基督的"上帝".
|
| 关 键 词： | 神 相 "相"的目的论 "神"的目的论 |
| 文章编号： | 1000-3541(2005)03-0119-06 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005年1月15日 |
Plato's God |
| |
| SHI Yong-ze.Plato's God[J].The Northern Forum,2005(3):119-124. |
| |
| Authors: | SHI Yong-ze |
| |
| Abstract: | In the paper, we'll mainly study Plato's God. We'll offer the reason why Plato reformed the teleology of Ideas. Plato's God can't create material stuff from nothing, and only endow order to them as does. So the God differs from Judaism-Christianity's God. In Timaeus, Plato's God is quite similar to Judaism-Christianity's God, even though they aren't the same. |
| |
| Keywords: | God Ideas the teleology of Ideas the teleology of God |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
