| 18世纪汉学书院与科举关系新论 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李兵.18世纪汉学书院与科举关系新论[J].厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005(2):20-25. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李兵 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 湖南大学,岳麓书院中国书院研究中心,湖南,长沙,410082 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 全国教育规划"十五"规划课题(EAB030508) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 18世纪中叶出现的乾嘉学派以书院作为汉学研究和传播的基地。由于汉学家执掌的书院与直接为科举考试服务的考课式书院有显著的差异,造成了汉学书院不为培养科举人才服务的假象。其实,汉学家主持的书院不仅在山长的延聘上注重科甲出身,而且其教学活动也不排斥科举之学,能满足生徒获取科场应试知识的需求。因此,汉学书院与科举的关系十分密切。
|
| 关 键 词： | 汉学书院 科举教学 乾嘉学派 |
| 文章编号： | 0438-0460(2005)02-0020-06 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004年7月19日 |
On the Relationship Between the Study of Chinese Classics and the Imperial Examinations System in the 18th Century |
| |
| LI Bing.On the Relationship Between the Study of Chinese Classics and the Imperial Examinations System in the 18th Century[J].Journal of Xiamen University(A Quarterly for Studies in Arts & Social Sciences),2005(2):20-25. |
| |
| Authors: | LI Bing |
| |
| Abstract: | With the Qianlong (1736-1799) and Jiaqing(1796-1819) School of Thoughts becoming prevalent the Chinese classics were studied and taught in academies. Because of the differences between those academies and the imperial examination oriented schools, some people figured that scholars of Qianlong and Jiaqing School were against imperial examination system. In fact, they not only attached importance to the grades resulted from the imperial examination in appointing the leading scholars, but also advocated stereotyped writing to meet the need of imperial examination. There is a close relation between this School and the imperial examination system. |
| |
| Keywords: | academies of Chinese classical learning imperial examination oriented teaching study of relations |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
