| 从美国《第二次冲突法重述》看我国侵权冲突规则 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 黄长营,王承志.从美国《第二次冲突法重述》看我国侵权冲突规则[J].武汉大学学报：哲学社会科学版,2006,59(5):596-599. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 黄长营 王承志 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 湘潭大学,法学院,湖南,湘潭,411105
2. 中山大学,法学院,广东,广州,510275 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 美国《第二次冲突法重述》以最密切联系原则为核心,对一般侵权行为和特殊侵权行为的法律进行了系统规定,建立了一套科学的侵权冲突规则体系。对比美国冲突法重述规则与我国现行侵权冲突规则,我们应积极借鉴美国冲突法重述中的有关规定,在侵权领域全面引入最密切联系原则;区分一般侵权行为与特殊侵权行为,并将重要争点的法律适用纳入一般侵权行为予以规定;抛弃“双重可诉原则”。
|
| 关 键 词： | 冲突法重述 侵权 冲突规则 |
| 文章编号： | 1672-7320(2006)05-0596-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006年4月6日 |
Look at the Tort Choice-of-Law Rules of China from the Perspective of the Restatement of Conflicts (Second) of USA |
| |
| HUANG Changying,WANG Chengzhi.Look at the Tort Choice-of-Law Rules of China from the Perspective of the Restatement of Conflicts (Second) of USA[J].Wuhan University Journal (Social Sciences),2006,59(5):596-599. |
| |
| Authors: | HUANG Changying WANG Chengzhi |
| |
| Abstract: | The Restatement of Conflicts of Law(Second) of the U.S. has stipulated the choice-of-law rules for torts,systemically from general principle to particular torts.Comparing with the rules of the Restatement(Second),we should actively use the concerned rules for reference when we review the gain and loss in our conflicts legislation.Under the existing legal system,we could try to realize the perfect coordination between certainty and flexibility in conflict rules for torts. |
| |
| Keywords: | restatement of conflicts of law torts conflict rules |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
