从引证情况透析中国的民法学研究

学术论文的引证情况不仅反映研究主题的历史概况，更反映学界的交流与争鸣状况。通过分析《政法论坛》2001—2020年期间民法学论文引证状况发现：民法学论文的内外部引证数量不断增加，但与其他学科论文相比数量依然较低；主要引证法学尤其是民法学方面的文献，法学内部引证占据主要地位。这些情况表明我国民法学研究至今仍未打破自我封闭的学术藩篱。在未来的民法学研究中，为了开创民法学研究的新视角，寻找民法学研究的创新点，推动民法学的良性发展，应当打破部门法学分立格局，破除单一部门法的限制；打破学科间分立格局，促进学科间的交流借鉴；善用法学内部规范分析法的同时，注重运用外部学科特有的研究方法。

A Study on Researches on Civil Law in China from the Perspective of Academic Citation

Citation of academic papers reflects the historical overview of research topics, and the exchange and contention of academic opinions. Through the analysis of the citation of civil law research papers in Tribune of Political Science and Law from 2001 to 2020, we find that the number of citations of civil law research papers has been on the increase in recent years, but is still less than that of papers of other disciplines; the citations are mainly from literature of law, especially of civil law. This shows that the interdisciplinary exchange between civil law and other departments of law and other disciplines is limited, and researches on civil law have been confined within the scope of civil law. The future studies on civil law should break the separation between departmental laws and the restriction of individual departmental law, break the separation among disciplines and promote interdisciplinary exchange. While making good use of the normative analysis method in researches, the research methods of other disciplines should also be used to create a new perspective of civil law research and to promote the development of civil law research.