|
|||||
|
|
| 论委托理财合同的风险责任--兼议新《证券法》的委托理财条款 | |
| 引用本文： | 张冬. 论委托理财合同的风险责任--兼议新《证券法》的委托理财条款[J]. 学术交流, 2006, 0(2): 49-51 |
| 作者姓名： | 张冬 |
| 作者单位： | 哈尔滨工程大学,人文学院,黑龙江,哈尔滨,150001 |
| 摘 要： | 随着新《证券法》的出台,一般委托理财合同中的保底条款效力,成为证券界、法学界争论的难点。有人主张高风险高回报,保底条款有效;有人则主张委托代理关系下,保底条款无效。针对金融理财活动中委托行为与普通民事委托活动本质不同的问题,可以研究对《证券法》委托理财的禁止性规定作出狭义的司法解释,以维护理财交易中保底条款的有效性。 |
| 关 键 词： | 委托理财 担保条款 风险责任 |
| 文章编号： | 1000-8284(2006)02-0049-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005-06-11 |
On the Risk Obligation of Financial Management Contracts for Commission--Concurrently on the financing articles for commission in new Securities Law |
|
| ZHANG Dong. On the Risk Obligation of Financial Management Contracts for Commission--Concurrently on the financing articles for commission in new Securities Law[J]. Academic Exchange, 2006, 0(2): 49-51 | |
| Authors: | ZHANG Dong |
| Abstract: | From Securities Law was carried out,legal obligations of articles on guaranteed minimal profit concerning common financing contract for commission has become a focus in circles of securities and jurisprudents.Some claim it is available,while others embrace it invalid.In view of the different natures between act of commission and common civil delegation,the author undertakes a judicial interpretation on the forbidden provision of the commission in a narrow way,so as to preserve the validity of articles on guaranteed minimal profit. |
| Keywords: | financial management for commission warranty clause risk obligation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ | |