| 司法共识如何形成?——基于判决的可接受性 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 孙光宁.司法共识如何形成?——基于判决的可接受性[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2010(1). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 孙光宁 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 山东大学威海分校法学院,威海,264209 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 作为法律方法在司法过程中运作的起点,源于主体间性的共识具有重要的理论与实践意义,例如,它可以防止法官的恣意裁判,等等.司法共识的形成从主体路径上可以分为法官释明和两造协商两种,前者主要通过释明权制度来体现和运行,后者则包括了多种方式和形式,在不同的部门法中有着不同表现.司法共识的最终目标是提升司法判决的可接受性.
|
| 关 键 词： | 司法过程 共识 判决 可接受性 主体间性 |
How to Achieve Judicial Consensus:Based on the Acceptability of a Verdict |
| |
| SUN Guang-ning.How to Achieve Judicial Consensus:Based on the Acceptability of a Verdict[J].Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences),2010(1). |
| |
| Authors: | SUN Guang-ning |
| |
| Institution: | SUN Guang-ning(Law School,Sh,ong University at Weihai,Weihai 264209,P.R.China) |
| |
| Abstract: | As the starting point of the application of legal methods to judicial processes,legal consensus has great significance both in theory and in practice. A case in point is its role in preventing arbitrariness on the part of judges. There are two main approaches to achieve judicial consensus: Aufkaungsrecht of judges and negotiations of parties. The former mainly lies in Aufkaungsrecht while the latter involves various forms which vary with different branches of law. The ultimate goal of judicial consensus is ... |
| |
| Keywords: | judicial process consensus verdict acceptability intersubjectivity |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
