|
|||||
|
|
| 因欺诈、胁迫订立的合同应属可撤销的合同 | |
| 引用本文： | 许健. 因欺诈、胁迫订立的合同应属可撤销的合同[J]. 天津大学学报(社会科学版), 1999, 0(1) |
| 作者姓名： | 许健 |
| 作者单位： | 天津大学管理学院 |
| 摘 要： | 运用比较研究法将我国合同法草案中关于欺诈胁迫合同的法律规定，与西方两大法系合同法及《国际商事合同通则》的相应规定相比较．从其产生的原因、性质、法律后果等方面分析，认为在我国合同法中将欺诈、胁迫的合同规定为可撤销的合同，既有利于充分保护受欺诈、胁迫当事人的利益，又可使我国合同法律制度更接近于国际公约和国际惯例。 |
| 关 键 词： | 无效合同 可撤销合同 欺诈 胁迫 普通法 特殊法 |
CONTRACT UNDER FRAUD OR THREAT SHOULD BE REVOCABLE |
|
| Xu Jian. CONTRACT UNDER FRAUD OR THREAT SHOULD BE REVOCABLE[J]. Journal of Tianjin University(Social Sciences), 1999, 0(1) | |
| Authors: | Xu Jian |
| Abstract: | By comparing the similarities and differences between the stipulations about fraud and threat in Chinese contract and foreign corresponding laws, and analyzing the causes of engendering, nature and legal consequences,we conclude that it is rational to define the contract concluded under condition of fraud or threat as revocable. It isof advantage not only to fully protect the interests of concerned parities that are frauded or threated but also enable the system of the Chinese contract law to approach the international convention and custom. |
| Keywords: | invalid contract. revocable contract fraud. threat common law special law |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ | |