首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Quantitative Risk Assessment of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Finfish: A Model of Raw Horse Mackerel Consumption in Japan
Authors:Jun'ichiro Iwahori  Akio Yamamoto  Hodaka Suzuki  Takehisa Yamamoto  Toshiyuki Tsutsui  Keiko Motoyama  Mikiko Sawada  Tomoki Matsushita  Atsushi Hasegawa  Ken Osaka  Hajime Toyofuku  Fumiko Kasuga
Affiliation:1. Kochi Medical School, Nankoku, Kochi, Japan.;2. Infectious Disease Research Division, Hyogo Prefectural Institute of Public Health and Consumer Sciences, Kobe, Japan.;3. National Institute of Health Sciences, Setagaya‐ku, Tokyo, Japan.;4. National Institute of Animal Health, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.;5. Business Consulting Department, Hitachi East Japan Solutions, Ltd., Kawasaki, Japan.;6. Mitsubishi Research Institute, Inc., Chiyoda‐ku, Tokyo, Japan.;7. Graduate School of Dentistry, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.;8. National Institute of Public Health, Wako‐shi, Saitama, Japan.
Abstract:The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of implemented control measures to reduce illness induced by Vibrio parahaemolyticus (V. parahaemolyticus) in horse mackerel (Trachurus japonicus), seafood that is commonly consumed raw in Japan. On the basis of currently available experimental and survey data, we constructed a quantitative risk model of V. parahaemolyticus in horse mackerel from harvest to consumption. In particular, the following factors were evaluated: bacterial growth at all stages, effects of washing the fish body and storage water, and bacterial transfer from the fish surface, gills, and intestine to fillets during preparation. New parameters of the beta‐Poisson dose‐response model were determined from all human feeding trials, some of which have been used for risk assessment by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (USFDA). The probability of illness caused by V. parahaemolyticus was estimated using both the USFDA dose‐response parameters and our parameters for each selected pathway of scenario alternatives: washing whole fish at landing, storage in contaminated water, high temperature during transportation, and washing fish during preparation. The last scenario (washing fish during preparation) was the most effective for reducing the risk of illness by about a factor of 10 compared to no washing at this stage. Risk of illness increased by 50% by exposure to increased temperature during transportation, according to our assumptions of duration and temperature. The other two scenarios did not significantly affect risk. The choice of dose‐response parameters was not critical for evaluation of control measures.
Keywords:Dose‐response model  food‐borne microbial disease  quantitative risk assessment  raw fish  Vibrio parahaemolyticus
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号