首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

论苏轼的《春秋》学
引用本文:金生杨. 论苏轼的《春秋》学[J]. 西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2006, 25(5): 22-25
作者姓名:金生杨
作者单位:四川大学古籍所,四川,成都,610064
基金项目:四川省社会科学规划项目
摘    要:苏轼以《春秋》学为儒者本务,终身关心此学。他认为《春秋》一断以礼,当以观其意的办法探讨其旨;《左传》主以史实,不专为经,不专为例,最识《春秋》之用;而《公羊》、《毂梁》以义例解《春秋》有如法家,专求于绳约中,不可取。苏轼认为《春秋》立法虽严,而责人则宽。他还借《春秋》学反对王安石新法。在苏轼的影响下,在其周围形成了一个不小的《春秋》学学派。

关 键 词:苏轼  《春秋》学  学派
文章编号:1672-8505(2006)05-0022-04
修稿时间:2006-09-02

On Su Shi''''s Spring and Autumn Annals
JIN Sheng-yang. On Su Shi''''s Spring and Autumn Annals[J]. Journal of Xihua University:Philosophy & Social Sciences, 2006, 25(5): 22-25
Authors:JIN Sheng-yang
Abstract:Su Shi thought that Spring and Autumn Annals was a primary work to scholars. He disseminated it all his life since he took it as standard of ceremonies. He said that Zuo Zhuan valued history facts; Gong Yang and Gu Liang focussed on principle rulers. Su Shi also thought that the laws discussed in Spring and Autumn Annals were very strict, but they were excusable when practised to people. He objected to Wang An-shi's New Policies in his study of Spring and Autumn Annals. Under the influence of Su Shi, a school of scholars united under the principles of Spring and Autumn Annals.
Keywords:Su Shi  Spring and Autumn Annals  a school of scholars  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号