| 再论同义词 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 葛本仪.再论同义词[J].文史哲,2003(1):108-111. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 葛本仪 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 山东大学文学院,山东,济南,250100 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 一、现在对同义词的界定是不恰当的 ,应该把意义相同和相近的词分开 ,并给同义词以应有的地位 ;二、词的意义内容 ,即词的词汇意义及其概念对应性 ,以及语法意义和色彩意义是确定同义词的标准和理论根据 ;三、同义词有完全同义词、不完全同义词、义项交叉同义词、言语同义词四个类型 ,并各具不同的性质特点 ;四、古今词和词素也可形成同义关系 ,在这种情况下 ,色彩意义起着不可或缺的作用。
|
| 关 键 词： | 同义词 词义类聚 概念对应性 |
| 文章编号： | 0511-4721(2003)01-0108-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2002年9月20日 |
A Re-examination on Synonym |
| |
| GE Ben,yi.A Re-examination on Synonym[J].Journal of Literature,History and Philosophy,2003(1):108-111. |
| |
| Authors: | GE Ben yi |
| |
| Abstract: | First, the current definition of synonym is inappropriate. Words with common or close meanings should be separated and the synonym should has a deserved position; secondly, the content word's meaning should be the standard and theoretical foundation to define synonym; thirdly, there are types of synonym with different natures and characteristics; finally, present and past words and morpheme can constitute thesaurus and the meaning of color is necessary in such case. |
| |
| Keywords: | Synonym aggregation of common meaning Conceptual correspondency |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
