Testing between alternative models of choice under uncertainty—Comment |
| |
Authors: | John Quiggin |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Economics, Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University, GPO Box 4, ACT 2601, Canberra, Australia
|
| |
Abstract: | Battaglio, Kagel, and Jiranyakul use experimental tests to compare rank-dependent expected utility (RDEU), regret theory, prospect theory, and Machina's generalized smooth preferences model. They conclude that none of these models consistently organizes the data. The purpose of this note is to point out that RDEU theory was tested in combination with a hypothesis on the choice of functional form that has been explicitly rejected by the original author of the model (Quiggin, 1982, 1987). When the original form of RDEU theory is tested, it performs quite well. |
| |
Keywords: | rank-dependent expected utility alternative choice models |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|