| 论中国古代水权纠纷的民事审理 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 田东奎.论中国古代水权纠纷的民事审理[J].西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2006,36(6):72-77. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 田东奎 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 宝鸡文理学院,政法系,陕西,宝鸡,721007 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 司法部专项基金项目(05SFB5004) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 采用法社会学的方法探讨了中国古代水权纠纷的民事审判,为构建我国水权纠纷解决机制提供历史借鉴。中国古代水权纠纷审判分两种方式,即水权纠纷民事审判和附属刑案的水权纠纷审判,前者依据普通民事审判的程序审理,州县衙门是审判的主要承担者;在法律适用方面,习惯法扮演着重要的角色。附属于刑案的水权纠纷审判,以刑事审理为主,民事部分只是刑事部分的附属,不具有重要地位。无论是前者,还是后者,判决的执行分实体执行与非实体执行,其中非实体执行更为重要。
|
| 关 键 词： | 水权 审判 法律 习惯法 |
| 文章编号： | 1000-2731(2006)06-0072-06 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006年1月20日 |
On the Justice of Water Right Disputes in Modern China |
| |
| TIAN Dong-kui.On the Justice of Water Right Disputes in Modern China[J].Journal of Northwest University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition),2006,36(6):72-77. |
| |
| Authors: | TIAN Dong-kui |
| |
| Abstract: | Applying the method of sociological law,this paper discusses the justice of water-right disputes in modern China,which include civil justice and justice pertaining to criminal trial.Of the two kinds,the former cases were judged by ordinary civil procedure and the latter were done by the procedure of criminal trial.The officials of counties and stages judged most cases of water-right disputes.When the officials judged the cases,they used customs and local statutes.As for the enforcement of verdict,it includes the enforcement of substantiality and non-substantiality.The enforcement of non-substantiality is more important than that of substantiality. |
| |
| Keywords: | Water rights justice law custom |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
