首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

六门临床课程形成性评价实践研究
引用本文:孙,敏.六门临床课程形成性评价实践研究[J].南京医科大学学报(社会科学版),2012,12(2):144-147.
作者姓名:  
作者单位:南京医科大学第四临床医学院,江苏 南京,210029
基金项目:中华医学会医学教育分会2010年度医学教育研究课题
摘    要:文章抽样南京医科大学六门临床课程成绩,通过SPSS统计软件分析形成性评价、终结性评价、综合性评价成绩的相关性和差异性。结果显示终结性评价具有较高评价效力,无论在综合性评价中占分比例大小,都与综合性评价呈显著正相关;形成性评价需要占有较大分值比例,才与综合性评价显著相关。结果提示,课程学习成绩评价需要调整和明确目标要求,不同的评价方法适用于不同的评价目标要求;不少课程现行的形成性评价方法需要进一步改进。

关 键 词:临床课程  形成性评价  终结性评价  综合性评价
收稿时间:3/5/2012 12:00:00 AM

Research on the practices of formative assessment of six clinical courses
SUN Min.Research on the practices of formative assessment of six clinical courses[J].Acta Universitatis Medicinalis Nanjing(Social Science),2012,12(2):144-147.
Authors:SUN Min
Institution:SUN Min(The Fourth School of Clinical Medicine,Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing 210029,China)
Abstract:The article analyzed the correlations and differences among formative,summative and comprehensive assessment of six clinical courses with SPSS.The results showed that summative assessment was more effective and had a significant correlation with comprehensive assessment no matter the proportion,and the correlation between formative and comprehensive assessment was related to the big proportion of formative assessment.These results suggested that it was necessary to adjust and clear the goal and requirement of course assessment,different methods of assessment should be applied to different goals and requirements of assessment,and many methods of formative assessment for existing courses should be further improved.
Keywords:clinical course  formative assessment  summative assessment  comprehensive assessment
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《南京医科大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《南京医科大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号