Understanding human ambivalence about sex: The effects of stripping sex of meaning |
| |
| Authors: | Jamie L. Goldenberg Cathy R. Cox Tom Pyszczynski Jeff Greenberg Sheldon Solomon |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Department of Psychology , Boise State University , Boise, ID, 83725–1715 E-mail: jgolden@boisestate.edu.;2. University of Colorado , Colorado Springs;3. University of Arizona ,;4. Brooklyn College , |
| |
| Abstract: | We offer a theoretical perspective to provide insight into why people are ambivalent about sex and why cultures regulate sex and attach symbolic meaning to it. Building on terror management theory, we propose that sex is problematic for humankind in part because it reminds us of our creaturely mortal nature. Two experiments investigated the effects of reminding people of the similarity between humans and other animals on their reactions to the physical aspects of sex. In Study 1, priming human‐animal similarities led to increased accessibility of death‐related thoughts after thinking about the physical but not romantic aspects of sex. In Study 2, when participants were reminded of similarities between humans and other animals, mortality salience resulted in decreased attraction to the physical but not romantic aspects of sex. In each study, priming thoughts about how humans are distinct from animals eliminated the association between sex and death. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
|
