首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论全球气候治理中城市的角色转型——兼论中国困境与出路
引用本文:冯帅.论全球气候治理中城市的角色转型——兼论中国困境与出路[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2020,22(2):151-160.
作者姓名:冯帅
作者单位:四川大学 法学院, 四川 成都 610207
基金项目:国家社会科学基金青年项目“气候治理的‘逆全球化’态势与国际法应对研究”(18CFX080);司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目“国际法视阈下海洋环境治理模式的转型及中国对策研究”(19SFB3053)
摘    要:从全球气候治理的1.0时期、2.0时期到3.0时期,城市逐渐实现了从“幕后参与者”到“共同引领者”的角色转型。这一转型既得益于全球治理理论在气候变化领域的延伸,更受惠于城市外交理论的推动和全球气候治理中“集体行动的困境”之驱使。就目前来看,中国城市的这一“共同引领者”角色还无法完全体现出来——不仅在隐性的“南北分割”的权力结构和发展中国家的气候治理分歧中,面临着对外发展的困境;而且在中央政府对地方政府的气候治理行动的“单向”型构造及城市的“经济发展”和“治理责任”的两难抉择中,面临着对内优化的瓶颈。针对这些问题,中国可以采取“两条干路+六条支路”的“两轨并行”式路径来寻求合理的应对之策。国家可以在寻求发展中国家的集体身份认同之时,进一步完善国内温室气体减排政策和立法,并赋予城市以一定的自主性;而城市也可以在深化城市气候外交,加强与国家的“双向”型气候治理互动的同时,推动“韧性城市”的长效发展。

关 键 词:全球气候治理    3.0时期    城市    共同引领者
收稿时间:2018/5/27 0:00:00

On City's Role Transformation in Global Climate Governance—Also on China's Predicaments and Outlets
FENG Shuai.On City's Role Transformation in Global Climate Governance—Also on China's Predicaments and Outlets[J].Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition),2020,22(2):151-160.
Authors:FENG Shuai
Institution:School of Law, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan 610207, China
Abstract:From the 1.0 and 2.0 Era to the 3.0 Era of global climate governance, city has gradually realized the role transformation from "Participant behind the Scene" to "Co-leader". This change is driven not only by the extension of global governance theory in the field of climate change, but also by the promotion of urban diplomacy theory and the "dilemma of collective action" in global climate governance. For now, however, China''s city couldn''t give full play to the function of "co-leader"-it is not only facing the dilemma of foreign development with the implicit power structure of "South-North" and divergence in climate governance among developing countries, but also facing the bottleneck of internal optimization with the "unidirectional" type structure of climate governance between central government and local government, and coordination between city''s "economic development" and "governance responsibility". To solve those problems, China can adopt the mode of "parallel tracks" formed by "two trunk roads plus six branch roads" to seek reasonable countermeasures. In other words, the country of China can seek its identity of developing country in the global society, further improve domestic policies and legislation on greenhouse gas emission reduction, and give city a certain degree of autonomy; while the city can deepen urban climate diplomacy, strengthen the "bidirectional" type of climate governance interaction with the country of China, and promote the long-term development of "resilient city".
Keywords:global climate governance  in the Era of 3  0  city  co-leader
点击此处可从《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号