首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

人民法院审判辅助业务外包的合法性控制
引用本文:周林.人民法院审判辅助业务外包的合法性控制[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2019,21(2):137-144.
作者姓名:周林
作者单位:厦门大学法学院,福建厦门,361005
基金项目:司法部2017年度国家法治与法学理论研究立项重点课题“我国高端法律服务整合提升对策研究”(17SFB1001)
摘    要:人民法院审判辅助业务外包反映了中国基层人民法院正在进行自发的审判辅助业务配置改革,是当前司法改革在基层人民法院的一个缩影。这种自发性职权配置改革的合法基础在于不触及审判核心业务。同时,由于司法性质的审判辅助业务自身固有的司法权属性以及由因变异而带有的行政权属性,其外包的方式应当兼具司法权的公正价值与行政权的效率价值。对此,人民法院可以通过保留审判辅助业务的决定权,委托审判辅助业务的执行权来维护审判辅助业务外包的合法性底线。

关 键 词:司法改革  审判辅助业务  外包  合法性控制
收稿时间:2018/5/10 0:00:00

The Legitimacy Control of the Judicial Assistant Business Outsourcing of the Court
ZHOU Lin.The Legitimacy Control of the Judicial Assistant Business Outsourcing of the Court[J].Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition),2019,21(2):137-144.
Authors:ZHOU Lin
Institution:1.School of Law, Xiamen Iniversity, Xiamen Fujian 361005, China
Abstract:Judicial assistant business outsourcing reflects the basic people's courts in our country is undergoing spontaneous reform of assistant business configuration,it is a microcosm of the current judicial reform in the basic people's court. The legal basis of this kind of automatic power allocation reform is not to touch the core business of the trial. At the same time,due to the inherent jurisdiction of the judicial assistant business and attributes of executive power,the ways of outsourcing ought to be have just value of judicial power and efficiency value of administrative power. In this regard,the people's court can keep the power of making decision and outsourcing the power of executing to preserve the legal bottom line.
Keywords:judicial reform  judicial assistant business  outsourcing  the legitimacy control
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号