|
|||||
|
|
| 浅析法释[2000]33号司法解释的两处失误 | |
| 引用本文： | 张庆旭. 浅析法释[2000]33号司法解释的两处失误[J]. 广西青年干部学院学报, 2001, 11(2): 55-57 |
| 作者姓名： | 张庆旭 |
| 作者单位： | 阜阳师范学院,政法系,安徽,阜阳,236000 |
| 摘 要： | 最高人民法院 [2000]33号司法解释与刑法相关规定的对比，存在着与法律相背的两处失误：一是钱可以“消”罪；二是共同过失构成共犯。前者可规定为能积极赔偿的可减轻或免以刑罚来解决，后者去掉画蛇添足的共犯二字即可。 |
| 关 键 词： | 最高人民法院 司法解释 法释[2000]33号 交通肇事罪 失误 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-5254(2001)02-0055-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2001-02-15 |
Two Errors in Judicial Interpretations No.33[2000] |
|
| Zhang Qingxu. Two Errors in Judicial Interpretations No.33[2000][J]. Journal of Guangxi Youth Leaders College(Journal of Guangxi Teenager's Research Association), 2001, 11(2): 55-57 | |
| Authors: | Zhang Qingxu |
| Affiliation: | Zhang Qingxu |
| Abstract: | The author of this paper compares Judicial Interpretations No.33 [2000] by Supreme People's Court with the related articles of the Criminal Law.He believes that there are two errors in the Judicial Interpretations concerning the criminal case of traffic disturbance.At the same time,he also makes a brief analysis of the errors and puts forward amendments. |
| Keywords: | Supreme People's Court Judicial Interpretations No.33[2000] traffic disturbance crime errors |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ | |