| 哈贝马斯与韦伯合理化理论之比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 陆自荣.哈贝马斯与韦伯合理化理论之比较[J].海南大学学报(人文社会科学版),2004,22(1):7-12. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 陆自荣 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 湖南科技大学,法学院,湖南,湘潭,411201 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 哈贝马斯和韦伯的合理化理论一脉相承,但二者在世界图景假设、哲学基础、理论性质3方面都有所不同:韦伯立足于超验世界和经验世界的对立来建构其合理化理论,其哲学基础是意识哲学,建构的合理性是普遍真理的形式合理性;哈贝马斯的合理化理论的世界图景假设是经验世界内的系统和生活世界的对立,其哲学基础是语言哲学,建构的合理性是共识的交往合理性。
|
| 关 键 词： | 哈贝马斯 韦伯 合理化 |
| 文章编号： | 1004-1710(2004)01-0007-06 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003年9月12日 |
A Comparative Study of the Rationalization Theories between Habermas' and Weber's |
| |
| LU Zi-rong.A Comparative Study of the Rationalization Theories between Habermas' and Weber's[J].Humanities & Social Sciences Journal of Hainan University,2004,22(1):7-12. |
| |
| Authors: | LU Zi-rong |
| |
| Abstract: | Despite their shared heritage, Habermas and Weber vary with respect to assumption of world images, philosophy and nature of their rationalization theories. Weber's rationalization theory is based on the assumption of between super-empirical world and empirical world and the "consciousness" philosophy, and it falls into the category of formal-rationality about logic truth. In contrast, Habermas' rationalization theory is founded on the assumption of between system and life-world in empirical world and language philosophy, and can be classified into a kind of communicative rationality about common ground. |
| |
| Keywords: | Habermas Weber rationalization |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
