学术研究岂可背离学理——对黄浩博士《文学的面孔:正在变得模糊起来》的学术批评

黄浩博士所谓的"后文学时代"与其所谓的"文学经典时代"一样是虚假的,它严重歪曲了文学生活的本相。从历史发展的角度看,也许存在着一个"后文学时代",但它不是也不可能像黄浩博士所"描绘"和"规定"的那样。那它是何样子的呢?要回答这样一个吃力且不易于讨好的问题,除黄浩博士所特别看重的"理论勇气"和"历史责任感"之外,还应该尊重客观事实,依循学理要求,并且有足够的耐心。

Abstracts and Key Words of Major Articles Academic Research Should Not Be Against Principles of Learning

Like his "age of classical literature," Dr. Huang Hao’s "post-literature period" is false,for it severely distorts the essence of literary life. From the perspective of historical development, there might exist an age of "post-literature." However,it was not,and could not have been,what Huang Hao "described" and "prescribed." Then what on earth is it like? To answer this tough and thorny question,objective facts must be respected,the requirements for the principles of learning must be observed,and enough patience must be gathered,besides the "theoretical courage" and "sense of historical responsibility" suggested by Huang Hao.