A one-sample location test based on weighted averaging of two test statistics when the dimension and the sample size are large

We discuss a one-sample location test that can be used when the dimension and the sample size are large. It is well-known that the power of Hotelling’s test decreases when the dimension is close to the sample size. To address this loss of power, some non exact approaches were proposed, e.g., Dempster (1958 Dempster, A.P. (1958). A high dimensional two sample significance test. Ann. Math. Stat. 29:995–1010.Crossref] , Google Scholar], 1960 Dempster, A.P. (1960). A significance test for the separation of two highly multivariate small samples. Biometrics 16:41–50.Crossref], Web of Science ®] , Google Scholar]), Bai and Saranadasa (1996 Bai, Z.D., Saranadasa, H. (1996). Effect of high dimension: by an example of a two sample problem. Stat. Sin. 6:311–329.Web of Science ®] , Google Scholar]), and Srivastava and Du (2008 Srivastava, M.S., Du, M. (2008). A test for the mean vector with fewer observations than the dimension. J. Multivariate Anal. 99:386–402.Crossref], Web of Science ®] , Google Scholar]). In this article, we focus on Hotelling’s test and Dempster’s test. The comparative merits and demerits of these two tests vary according to the local parameters. In particular, we consider the situation where it is difficult to determine which test should be used, that is, where the two tests are asymptotically equivalent in terms of local power. We propose a new statistic based on the weighted averaging of Hotelling’s T²-statistic and Dempster’s statistic that can be applied in such a situation. Our weight is determined on the basis of the maximum local asymptotic power on a restricted parameter space that induces local asymptotic equivalence between Hotelling’s test and Dempster’s test. Numerical results show that our test is more stable than Hotelling’s T²-statistic and Dempster’s statistic in most parameter settings.