首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

中国现代新诗理论批评的历史经验
引用本文:潘颂德. 中国现代新诗理论批评的历史经验[J]. 延边大学东疆学刊, 2002, 19(4): 8-15
作者姓名:潘颂德
作者单位:上海社会科学院,文学研究所,上海,201102
摘    要:中国现代新诗理论批评从诞生起 ,自始至终存在着两对最基本的矛盾 :一是西方现代诗学与中国传统诗学的矛盾 ,二是坚持启蒙救亡与坚持诗歌本体的矛盾。针对第一对矛盾 ,袁可嘉、唐等“九叶”派诗论家继承“五四”以来周作人、梁宗岱、朱自清、穆木天、闻一多、朱光潜等前辈新诗理论批评家融汇中西诗学的理论成果 ,创造了具有中国特色的现代诗学 ;针对第二矛盾 ,胡适、象征派、现代派、七月诗派等诗论家进行了深入的探讨与研究 ,在此基础上 ,九叶诗派提出了“在现实和艺术之间求得平衡”的主张。中国现代新诗理论批评正是在不断地寻求妥善解决这两对基本矛盾的实践过程中 ,逐步萌芽、滋长、发展、丰富、深化的

关 键 词:中国现代新诗理论批评  西方现代诗学  中国传统诗学  启蒙救亡  诗歌本体  新诗理论批评家
文章编号:1002-2007(2002)04-0008-08
修稿时间:2002-07-01

A Review of New Poetic Criticism in Modern China
Pan Songde. A Review of New Poetic Criticism in Modern China[J]. Dongjiang Journal, 2002, 19(4): 8-15
Authors:Pan Songde
Abstract:Since its emergence, China's new poetic criticism had contained two fundamental contradictions: one between modern Western poetics and traditional Chinese poetics, and the other between enlightenment for national salvation and poetry itself. To resolve these two contradictions, such Jiuye school poetry critics as Yuan Kejia and Tang Shi inherited theoretical achievements in poetics made by the forerunners, and originated modern poetics with Chinese characteristics. Hu Shi, together with the symbolist school, the modernist school and the July school poetry critics made deeper explorations, and the Jiuye school expounded its view of keeping a balance between reality and art. In the process of resolving both contradictions, China's new poetic criticism has been well matured.
Keywords:new poetic criticism in modern China   modern Western poetics   traditional Chinese poetics   enlightenment for national salvation   poetry itself   new poetry critic  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号