首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

质量和创新导向下高校人文社会科学成果评价机制
引用本文:李丽娟1,樊建强2. 质量和创新导向下高校人文社会科学成果评价机制[J]. 长安大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 0(3): 72-77
作者姓名:李丽娟1  樊建强2
作者单位:1. 武警工程大学军事教育学院;2. 长安大学经济与管理学院
摘    要:受制于管理机制以及外部环境等因素的影响,高校人文社会科学成果评价中存在学术评价行政化、评价标准模糊化、评价主体失位化、评价方法过分量化、评价程序失范化、评价工具落后化等诸多问题,亟待改进。研究认为,现阶段应坚持服务学术发展与促进学术繁荣、尊重学术规律与分级分类评价、注重同行专家评价等原则,坚持培育多元化评价主体、以质量和创新为导向的评价标准,建立分类评价的指标体系、综合运用适宜的评价方法的评价机制改进思路,提出了完善评价制度、遴选评价主体、改进评价技术等保障措施。

关 键 词:人文社会科学  科研成果  差别化评价  学术共同体  代表性成果

Evaluation mechanism of the achievements of humanities and social sciences in colleges under the guidance of quality and innovation
LI Li-juan,FAN Jian-qiang. Evaluation mechanism of the achievements of humanities and social sciences in colleges under the guidance of quality and innovation[J]. Journal of Chang'an University(Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 0(3): 72-77
Authors:LI Li-juan  FAN Jian-qiang
Affiliation:1. School of Military Education, Armed Police Engineering University; 2. School of Economics and Management, Chang’an University
Abstract:Due to the influence of management mechanism and external environment, there are lots of problems in the evaluation mechanism of humanities and social sciences in colleges, such as the administerization of academic evaluation, the fuzzification of evaluation criterion, the absence of evaluation subject, the excessive quantification of evaluation method, the anomie of evaluation procedures, the backwardness of evaluation tools, and so on, which need to be improved urgently. The results suggest that at the present stage some principles should be insisted on, such as promoting academic development and prosperity, respecting academic discipline and hierarchical classification, emphasizing peer review, and so on. The evaluation mechanism should be implemented, including cultivating multi evaluation subject, taking quality and innovation as the evaluation criterion of, building the index system of hierarchical evaluation, and applying appropriate evaluation method. This paper also put forward the safeguard measures, such as perfecting evaluation system, selecting evaluation subject, improving evaluation technology, and so on.
Keywords:humanities and social sciences  scientific research achievements  differential evaluation  academic community  representative achievements
点击此处可从《长安大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《长安大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号